week 1 306 class assignment

Get perfect grades by consistently using our writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

Instructions

The purpose of this assignment is to establish a framework for the knowledge you hope to gain by the end of this course.

In 1-2 pages, please address the following points:

  • Define health care finance.
  • Summarize your current professional experience with financial management, specifying if that experience is within the health care sector.
  • List three learning objectives for yourself in this course.
  • Explain how you will continue to strengthen the content areas of your learning objectives, beyond completion of this course. Include links to any sources on your reference page.
  • Name your “dream job.” Explain the type of financial management duties you might have in this position.
  • Include a reference page, with a minimum of three references in APA style.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Knowledge Framework

Rubric

HC306 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework

HC306 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

9.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

8.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

7.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

6.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

20.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

PreviousNext

Got stuck with another paper? We can help! Use our paper writing service to score better grades and meet your deadlines.

Get 15% discount for your first order


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order Instantly!